DIGITAL ANALYSIS OF TOOTH SIZES AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH DIFFERENT MALOCCLUSIONS: A STUDY USING THREE-DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL DENTAL MODELS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47820/recisatec.v4i1.333Keywords:
digital analysis, malocclusions, tooth size.Abstract
The objective of the study was to examine the sizes of teeth, in digital models of patients with different malocclusions, with the help of three-dimensional measurement software. 68 digital models of 34 patients aged between 21 and 29 years were analyzed. A review was carried out to determine the participants according to Angle's classification, leaving 24 patients in the class I group and 10 patients in the class II group. Then, the patients' plaster models were scanned, using the Dentsply Sirona Cerec Omnicam Software 5.2 digital scanner, thus obtaining their digital format. NemoStudio-2022 software was then used to perform tooth size measurements. After analysis of the measurements, it was observed that the anterior and general mesiodistal sizes were not statistically related to the different malocclusions. There was also no difference between the groups in terms of values of the previous proportion, nor when evaluating the values of the general proportion between the groups. Finally, no malocclusion group had a significant relationship with the alteration of anterior or general mesiodistal size. The difference in mesiodistal tooth size of the antero-upper and antero-inferior teeth does not contribute to the appearance of Angle Class I, Class II and Class III malocclusions since there were no statistically significant relationships in this regard.
Downloads
References
Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, O'Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4
Bernardi S, Angelone AM, Macchiarelli G. Anatomy in dentistry: From the beginnings to contemporary reality. Clin Anat. 2022 Sep;35(6):711-722. doi: 10.1002/ca.23869. Epub 2022 Apr 9. PMID: 35368109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23869
Black GV. Descriptive anatomy of the human teeth. Philadelphia: S.S. White Manufacturing Company, 1897.http://resource.nlm.nih.gov/67610310R
Jabri MA, Wu S, Zhang Y, Ma J, Wang L. A Review on Comparison of Tooth Size Discrepancies among Angle's Class I, II, and III Malocclusion: Is There a Significance? J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):994-999. PMID: 31797860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2615
Karadede Ünal B, Dellaloğlu D. Digital analysis of tooth sizes among individuals with different malocclusions: A study using three-dimensional digital dental models. Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211038186. doi: 10.1177/00368504211038186. PMID: 34490798; PMCID: PMC10367186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504211038186
Dindaroğlu F, Duran GS, Aras I. Three-dimensional evaluation of morphologic tooth symmetry in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Sep;150(3):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.017. PMID: 27585774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.017
Rakhshan V, Ghorbanyjavadpour F, Ashoori N. Buccolingual and Mesiodistal Dimensions of the Permanent Teeth, Their Diagnostic Value for Sex Identification, and Bolton Indices. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 10;2022:8381436. doi: 10.1155/2022/8381436. PMID: 35187172; PMCID: PMC8853791.
Mollabashi V, Soltani MK, Moslemian N, Akhlaghian M, Akbarzadeh M, Samavat H, Abolvardi M. Comparison of Bolton ratio in normal occlusion and different malocclusion groups in Iranian population. Int Orthodox. 2019 Mar;17(1):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 13. PMID: 30770330.
Alsaigh H, Alrashdi M. Morphometric analysis of tooth morphology among different malocclusion groups in a Hispanic population. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):199. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-02882-7. PMID: 37013534; PMCID: PMC10071771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02882-7
Hussein FA, Mohamed RE, El-Awady AA, Ali MM, Al-Khalifa HN, Abdallah KF, Abouelnour AM. Digital evaluation of Bolton's tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions categories of Egyptian adolescent orthodontic population: A retrospective study. Int Orthodox. 2022 Sep;20(3):100660. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100660. Epub 2022 Jun 21. PMID: 35739004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100660
Alsaigh H, Alrashdi M. Geometric analysis of tooth size among different malocclusion groups in a Hispanic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Nov;164(5):646-656. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Jun 3. PMID: 37278676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.03.022
Smith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E. Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations: "does Bolton's analysis apply?". Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Feb;117(2):169-74. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70228-9. PMID: 10672217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70228-9
Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas D, Clarkson Q. Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. Am J Orthodox. 1974 Nov;66(5):479-86. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(74)90109-2. PMID: 4621246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90109-2
Basaran G, Selek M, Hamamci O, Akkuş Z. Intermaxillary Bolton tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthodox. 2006 Jan;76(1):26-30. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0026:IBTSDA]2.0.CO;2. PMID: 16448265.
Akyalçin S, Doğan S, Dinçer B, Erdinc AM, Oncağ G. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications. Angle Orthodox. 2006 Jul;76(4):637-43. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0637:BTSDIS]2.0.CO;2. PMID: 16808571.
Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of spatial analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.044. PMID: 17826603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.044
Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthodox. 2006 May;76(3):459-65. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0459:TSDAAP]2.0.CO;2. PMID: 16637727.
Wedrychowska-Szulc B, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Stepień P. Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthodox. 2010 Jun;32(3):313-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp114. Epub 2009 Dec 16. PMID: 20018795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp114
Lombardo L, Setti S, Molinari C, Siciliani G. Intra-arch widths: a meta-analysis. Int Orthodox. 2013 Jun;11(2):177-92. English, French. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Apr 2. PMID: 23558045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2013.02.005
Ocak I, Karsli N, Altug AT, Aksu M. Relationship between vertical facial morphology and dental arch measurements in class II malocclusion: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2023 Sep 5;11:e16031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16031. PMID: 37692120; PMCID: PMC10487581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16031
Kaur, Avninder, et al. "Evaluation and applicability of Moyers mixed dentition arch analysis in Himachal population." Dental Journal of Advance Studies 2.02 (2014): 096-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1671993
Janson GR, Metaxas A, Woodside DG, de Freitas MR, Pinzan A. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Apr;119(4):406-18. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113267. PMID: 11298314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113267
Oktay H, Ulukaya E. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Eur J Orthodox. 2010 Jun;32(3):307-12. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp079. Epub 2009 Sep 3. PMID: 19729399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp079
Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyzes with a commonly used method. Angle Orthodox. 2001 Oct;71(5):351-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0351:ACOCBT>2.0.CO;2. PMID: 11605868.
Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Aug;142(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.028. PMID: 22858338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.028
White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.019. PMID: 20362900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.019
De Luca Canto G, Pachêco-Pereira C, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C, Major PW. Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 May;18(2):65-76. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12068. Epub 2015 Feb 11. PMID: 25677755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12068
Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Nov;146(5):673-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Oct 28. PMID: 25439218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023
Paulino V, Paredes V, Cibrian R, Gandia JL. Tooth size changes with age in a Spanish population: percentile tables. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Sep 1;16(6):e840-4. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17093. PMID: 21196845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17093
Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955 Feb;12(3-4):265-92. doi: 10.3109/00016355509028167. PMID: 14375894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016355509028167
Mishra RK, Kafle D, Gupta R. Analysis of Interarch Tooth Size Relationship in Nepalese Subjects with Normal Occlusion and Malocclusions. Int J Dent. 2019 Nov 18;2019:2761427. doi: 10.1155/2019/2761427. PMID: 31827516; PMCID: PMC6885765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2761427
Mollabashi V, Soltani MK, Moslemian N, Akhlaghian M, Akbarzadeh M, Samavat H, Abolvardi M. Comparison of Bolton ratio in normal occlusion and different malocclusion groups in Iranian population. Int Orthodox. 2019 Mar;17(1):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 13. PMID: 30770330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.005
Rakhshan V, Ghorbanyjavadpour F, Ashoori N. Buccolingual and Mesiodistal Dimensions of the Permanent Teeth, Their Diagnostic Value for Sex Identification, and Bolton Indices. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 10;2022:8381436. doi: 10.1155/2022/8381436. PMID: 35187172; PMCID: PMC8853791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8381436
Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K, Lu X, Shi H, Lee ES, Jiang HB. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning. 2021 Jul 17;2021:9950131. doi: 10.1155/2021/9950131. PMID: 34367410; PMCID: PMC8313360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 RECISATEC - SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos/resenhas/TCCs publicados pertecem à revista RECISATEC, e seguem o padrão Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), permitindo a cópia ou reprodução, desde que cite a fonte e respeite os direitos dos autores e contenham menção aos mesmos nos créditos. Toda e qualquer obra publicada na revista, seu conteúdo é de responsabilidade dos autores, cabendo a RECISATEC apenas ser o veículo de divulgação, seguindo os padrões nacionais e internacionais de publicação.
